MSRB rules allow all of the following when selling a new issue of municipal bonds EXCEPT:

Prepare for the MSRB Rules Test. Study with flashcards and questions, each with helpful hints and explanations. Excel on your exam!

Multiple Choice

MSRB rules allow all of the following when selling a new issue of municipal bonds EXCEPT:

Explanation:
The key idea is what information about a primary sale a member can share with investors. In a new-issue offering, you may provide a Preliminary Official Statement if the Final Official Statement isn’t ready at settlement, and you can discuss standard terms and practices that investors rely on, such as the general pricing approach or, when appropriate, a repurchase arrangement that is properly documented. Disclosing the spread on reofferings isn’t always required for competitive bids, since there isn’t an underwriter spread in that context, and providing an oral repurchase agreement can be permissible within proper disclosure and writing requirements. What isn’t appropriate is sharing order priority provisions—the specifics of how orders are allocated among accounts within the underwriting syndicate. Those provisions are internal, nonpublic allocation mechanics, not material information about the security or issuer that an investor needs to know to make an informed decision. Revealing them could reveal allocation strategies or create perceptions of favoritism, which conflicts with fair dealing standards. Therefore, disclosing order priority provisions upon request is not allowed, making that option the exception.

The key idea is what information about a primary sale a member can share with investors. In a new-issue offering, you may provide a Preliminary Official Statement if the Final Official Statement isn’t ready at settlement, and you can discuss standard terms and practices that investors rely on, such as the general pricing approach or, when appropriate, a repurchase arrangement that is properly documented. Disclosing the spread on reofferings isn’t always required for competitive bids, since there isn’t an underwriter spread in that context, and providing an oral repurchase agreement can be permissible within proper disclosure and writing requirements.

What isn’t appropriate is sharing order priority provisions—the specifics of how orders are allocated among accounts within the underwriting syndicate. Those provisions are internal, nonpublic allocation mechanics, not material information about the security or issuer that an investor needs to know to make an informed decision. Revealing them could reveal allocation strategies or create perceptions of favoritism, which conflicts with fair dealing standards. Therefore, disclosing order priority provisions upon request is not allowed, making that option the exception.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy